Voiced Thoughts

…whilst travelling along life’s road.

the responsibility of government

with one comment

Today on BBC Radio Ulster‘s Stephen Nolan Show, Iris Robinson, a local politician, said that she believed government has a “responsibility to uphold God’s law” [listen here]. I believe she was referring to the so-called Moral Law laid down in the Ten Commandments. Her remarks were, in my opinion, ill-considered especially given they were made during a debate on abortion. I mean, the essence of the debate on abortion will be forgotten about quickly now; instead, people will focus on this sound bite… just like I’m doing now.

I didn’t listen to the Nolan show but I did hear much comment on it on the way home in the car on BBC Radio Ulster’s Evening Extra programme. The show welcomes responses from listeners through the media of text messages and, to a lesser extent, email. I was disappointed because the reaction of the apparent majority of responses was as I expected: typical, traditional, conservative and very Northern Irish. Most listeners who responded seemed to be in support of Mrs Robinson’s view. (Some were supportive of her stance on abortion, which is a separate matter; these listeners obviously didn’t catch onto the subject of the debate, which was on her remarks about her views on government responsibility.)

I find it difficult to believe that people who cannot think through things like this are governing our country. Obviously I disagree with Mrs Robinson’s remarks on governmental responsibility.

Think about it: if it was the responsibility of government to uphold God’s law then surely we should all be in prison because no one follow’s God’s law perfectly! The Bible, in which God’s law is quoted, tells us this! I am a Christian and have faith in the same God as Mrs Robinson but I cannot share this view. Jesus never forced anyone to listen to Him or obey Him, and neither should His followers. Submission to God’s law is up to the individual and should not be impressed by the church, the state or anyone else. I believe that there is plenty of good within God’s law, but just because it’s God’s law shouldn’t mean it’s civil law. The responsibility of government is to ensure order within the state, and equality, security and opportunity for all people within that state.

Remarks like Mrs Robinson’s only help to build up walls and cause friction. I pray that she will come to her senses over this and that those who supported her stance on this will realise the mistake.

Written by Mark

July 17, 2008 at 7:17 pm

Posted in Northern Ireland

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I don’t think it is as black and white as that. The underlying issues resound with allowing evil and sin to prosper. (How free-p does that sound?!)

    On the one hand we can’t restrict people’s freedoms against their will right? But we do have laws restrict freedoms to stop people hurting others and hurting themselves. At what point do we allow people to hurt others and themselves (themselves being a more thorny issue in this case) to avoid restricting their freedoms?

    For example, should cocaine be made legal because people want it? Further down the scale, what about abortions? Even ignoring the taking a life issue (big issue to ignore) some people come out the other end and say they have had no problems, others are emotionally scarred for the rest of their life… should we penalise the choice of one for the protection of the other? Gay marriage? Thats a no-brainer on the human rights side right? But how about gay adoption? Then, of course, we notice that our laws seem to be good for us, but not too worried about those who aren’t fortunate to be counted as “us”. Import/export laws that encourage businesses to exploit poorer nations, economic policy that does the very same…

    Our laws are a far cry from those that governed the nation of Israel (although the Israelites, as you point out, couldn’t live up to God’s law…)
    And I think in light of this, we need to use God’s law as a kind of benchmark, many parts we can’t enforce across communities, and across religious boundaries… But the underlying driving themes of God’s laws, those of the benevolent creator, ought to be at the forefront of Christian politicians (and voters) minds when dealing with national issues. Just as you might seek to run your family following biblical example, so a national leader ought to seek to run the nation following biblical example.
    Obviously, as I’ve said, this stops at a point, we can’t and shouldn’t remove the religious freedom of others (we must be a light to the world in this sense), but we ought to run our countries with the same concern for the downtrodden and poverty stricken that God’s laws have, with the same reverence for human life and God’s creation that God’s laws have, with the same understanding of the human condition that God’s laws have…

    I don’t think we can simply dismiss what Robbo is saying, but I doubt this is what she really meant when she said it…

    Ormo

    July 17, 2008 at 8:33 pm


Leave a comment